Numerical or Mathematical language
Language is a way to communicate, and it is what makes humans rational, because through it, experiences can be accumulated for future generations. A human of the past had the science that had provided him with the language of that time, just as today, when we talk about scientists, mathematicians, cattlemen or farmers or, etc. They have the science that language has provided them through whatever era, but the most important thing is the accumulation of knowledge of the individual, because the accumulation of wisdom is only for the person who has the appropriate language . For example, the construction of a spaceship will only enter there those who have the same language, a farmer, could not enter with this language. Language as I say it is a means of progress, since the accumulation of knowledge in future generations from previous experiences makes it more and more a multiplier of science and experience, and so it is obviously transmitted directly to culture , of that tribe, people, civilization or culture. The difference between a person and an animal is precisely this, language. A bird or other animal makes its nest just as it did thousands of years ago, and why? Because of the language. The animal has not progressed, due to the consequence of language, since they do not accumulate lived experiences, and precisely this accumulation of knowledge and experiences means that humans have progress through the accumulation of human experiences. Well, but language is many things too. What I said about an accumulator of sciences and experiences is very important, but we must also not forget that in addition to all this, language is also a very important communicator, leaving out the feature of accumulating science. For example when we talk to a person we want to communicate a behavior or we want to explain something, an idea or we want him to explain something to us, it is a two-way communication. Depending on what I say, my interlocutor will say a response, an input will cause an output, and this communication is very complex. One can ask something and the answer is not necessarily obvious because it may have a connection to the question or at least a connection, but it is clear that if you ask something, the answer must have a connection to the question. And so is the language of today. It can be unclear, not concise and sometimes very dark, it is not always like that, but it can be like that. Written language is much clearer and more concise, and the messages that are made with writing are quite a lot clearer. Written communication is much slower and not as flexible as verbal communication. Today, language is a little more complex because language has continued in parallel with technology, and so it has meant that there are other means of language, which have a huge relevance to communication. Well, I’m not interested in language communication anymore. It’s not that I’m interested, not only with him, but what I want to talk about here is verbal language. Well, the importance of languages is, as I said, what makes us rational. However, the language is still in a very primitive and underdeveloped state, and there are times when it does not make sense. There is a Spanish saying that says: “¡ Cuando I say , I say , I say Diego!” It’s when you want to say something, but you don’t say anything. It’s a Murry thing. Well, that’s how language is, sometimes, you can spend two hours talking without saying anything, a person can be talking for a long time and you can follow the conversation, without committing to anything and even if you want, you don’t even have to listen the Just by looking at the interlocutor’s mouth, when it closes you can say “yes” or “no”, “man, don’t tell me”, “don’t fuck me”, “it’s true”, “Fuck”, ” Damn”, “Oysters”, etc. You don’t even need to open your mouth, a sigh or anything like that, surely you have experienced or lived this right? Because it’s something that happens every day. I think it is very important that when one says “yes” it means yes and when one says no it means no. Today, language is very indefinite. We don’t always want to compromise. In addition, it is very murri, and yes, when you say a postulate, you don’t always say what you think. That way we can always say it wasn’t that, but something else. In this way language is not an exact science. Life on our planet is very complex and can only be explained with the science of philosophy and poetry. Philosophy explains the complicated fabric of life in a simple way. Poetry describes the moments or feelings of life. Philosophy generally describes what is complicated or difficult with language, and poetry is the detail or feelings of life, it is the revelation of life itself explained through language where language has another meaning. Philosophy and Poetry have a lot in common, both use language, but very differently. Well, it is not my intention to enter either Philosophy or Poetry but quite the opposite. A new, cold language, not Philosophical, and not Poetic either, however concise it can be counted on, because it says what one thinks without any prejudice. It’s a little complicated at first, but it’s very revolutionary, and I think it may be here to stay. My problem is that two people who have been talking and have stayed in something, but then the result is that it was not the way they had talked, and even if they had recorded it with a tape recorder, the result would have been the same and that is because when a person speaks, even if he believes that the language he has used has been very specific, it has not been so, and that is why language is very objective and tendentious. Even if we say something that we think is very specific, what can be different for one person, can be different for another person. When we say yes or affirm something we can say yes or we can nod our head or say another word that can be understood as yes, but does not necessarily mean yes. If it is negative, we can say no, or say some word that suggests the negativity of the negation, but in any case the “yes” or “no” is not absolute. Language often seeks a solution not for the interlocutor but for itself, to be able to mitigate these effects, and to be able to clarify, specify our ideas so that they cannot be misrepresented. We need to do a more exact science. The idea would be numerical or mathematizing , or digitizing the language, and like that, I can say that it is a very exhaustive work, because it is very complex and would require at least one or several university chairs, of grammar, philosophy and letters and one or several telecommunications universities, all well united to do this project that could involve all the students, but the idea is very interesting. It would be very constructive, since a very exact language could be made. It would open up the possibility of a translation of all languages instantly and not just one, but all existing languages. Well, we’ll start with the idea, which is really quite simple. When we say “yes” this is an affirmation and we will give this word the value of for example 100. If we make a negation for example we say “No”, we will give it a value of 200. The value 100 would be a value that would be representative of every language Chinese, Japanese, for every language in the world it would be a “Yes” and a “No”. 200. Well a numerical value. Language is, as I said, very flexible and tendentious for the verbal communicator. Not here, here it would be exact, and also better, but clear and concise, to make the numerical language closer to the verbal. Yet never deceitful nor dead. For example, it can happen that one person communicates with a strong “Yes” and another that this “Yes” is not so strong. Semantically there is not much difference between these two “Sixes”, and this is when verbal communication deceives and betrays us, because verbally for the person there is nothing but a “Yes”. With Numerical or Mathematical Language, which I call from now on “LNM”, we said that “If” has a value of 100. That would be the maximum statement or the maximum value to a statement. The statement could have 5 values for example 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, where 96 would be a “Yes” but with a weak statement, 100 with a strong statement, which means “Hello” or ” Goodbye ” ” or “Good morning”. “Hello” is a dialogue introduction right? We could give him a number, right? “ Goodbye ” is the end of a conversation, however it could also be when you greet a person on the street, and do not start a conversation. Also instead of ” Goodbye ” you could say “Good morning”. The same, we also say this is “collonut”, “from puta mother”, or I do this “because it comes out of my nose”. Well, I could go on saying things like that for hours. Well, my whole idea is based on this, to give a numerical or digital value to a word, and maybe later to a sentence in order to be able to specify the language and be able to industrialize. It is a very difficult task, concretizing an idea when you need to make an international agreement between languages, it is enormously difficult to be able to synthesize an agreement, of this characteristic. Also the “LNM” Numeral language, could never be used verbally, is impossible. It must be accompanied by a digital translator, and could not be used to speak to a person. Perhaps this device would be useful to communicate with a person who speaks a different language. It could also be useful, imagine politicians using dirty language that says nothing, that has no substance. It would be a good job to clarify the language, to say things with the exact semantics, or the exact number that a digital device could translate and force the one who sends the message to say the truth of what he thinks.